“That command
is out of date.”
The stack changed. The instructions didn't. Find the operational guidance that no longer matches your repo.
STALE INSTRUCTIONSREPOSITORY INTELLIGENCE, FOR THE AGENT ERA
RepoChicken.
Good code.
Better context.
Your team knows the repo. Your coding agents should have a clearer starting point.
An AI Repository Context Audit that turns stale instructions and missing knowledge into an evidence-backed plan.
One focused engagement. No software subscription.
THE SCOPE1 repo. Up to 3 workflows.
THE HANDOFFEvidence. Priorities. A plan.
THE PILOT$2,500 USD / one time
01 / THE CONTEXT PROBLEM
New session.
Same corrections.
Before changing models or adding another tool, inspect what your agents are being told.
“That command
“We don't build
it that way.”
The decision exists, but the route to it is missing. Trace the gap between your conventions and the agent's context.
MISSING KNOWLEDGE“I've explained
this before.”
Important context is buried in chat, scattered across files, or contradicted by another rule. Make the conflict visible.
CONFLICTING GUIDANCEContext is one possible cause. We distinguish confirmed defects from behavior that still needs a live test.
02 / DON'T TAKE IT ON FAITH
Read the work.
Then decide.
A real inspection of our own repository. File references, clear consequences, and corrections your team can verify.
Open the complete audit
CTX-01CONFIRMED
Internal knowledge was included in the public image.
The Docker build copied repository-wide guidance into the website's document root.
Evidence & correctionCTX-02CONFIRMED
A playbook could stop an unrelated service.
Port troubleshooting did not require identifying the process owner first.
Evidence & correctionCTX-03VALIDATION GAP
Knowledge routes existed. Their use was untested.
A discoverable file is not proof that an agent reliably reads or follows it.
See the proposed test03 / WHAT YOU WALK AWAY WITH
A useful handoff.
Not another platform.
Built for the engineering team that has to make the next decision.
A map of your context
Agent entry points, instruction scope, knowledge routes, and gaps in coverage.
INVENTORYFindings you can trace
File-level evidence, consequences, confidence, and a clear distinction between defects and hypotheses.
AUDIT REPORTA prioritized way forward
What to keep, change, move, or remove, with acceptance checks for each recommendation.
ACTION PLANA technical conversation
Walk through the report, clarify the tradeoffs, and identify the next checks worth running.
REVIEW SESSIONGrounded in your actual setup
GitHub CopilotClaude CodeCodex
One agreed environment per audit.
Compatibility is assessed, not assumed.
04 / THE ENGAGEMENT
Small scope.
Clear next steps.
- 01 / ALIGN
Choose the friction.
Agree the repository, agent environment, access, and up to three workflows before work starts.
- 02 / INSPECT
Follow the evidence.
Review a fixed snapshot. Compare instructions and knowledge against the code and configuration.
- 03 / HAND OFF
Know what to address.
Receive the findings, priorities, and acceptance checks. Review the next steps together.
05 / YOUR FIRST AUDIT
One repo.
A clearer
starting point.
For engineering leaders already using coding agents and ready to investigate the same recurring mistakes.
See what the report looks likeAI REPOSITORY CONTEXT AUDIT
$2,500USD / one time
Proposed pilot price. Scope and delivery date agreed before any engagement.
- Repository
- 1 agreed snapshot
- Agent environment
- 1 setup, up to 3 workflows
- Target turnaround
- 5 business days after access
- Your involvement
- 30-min intake + 45-min review
- The handoff
- Inventory, report, plan, review
hello@repochicken.comNo booking or payment on this site.
The agreed-deliverables guarantee.
Missing an agreed deliverable? Tell us within 7 calendar days of delivery. We have 5 business days to supply or correct it. If we cannot, we refund your $2,500 audit fee.
This covers the agreed audit deliverables, not a minimum issue count, implementation, or agent performance gains.
Read the guarantee and engagement termsAudit and recommendations only. Implementation, security review, and before/after agent trials are separate. Scope, access, the provider's legal identity, and terms must be agreed in writing before payment.
06 / BEFORE WE BEGIN
Good questions.
Straight answers.
A focused service, with explicit boundaries.
Why not have an agent generate AGENTS.md?
Generating instructions is only one step. We inspect whether they match the repository, conflict with other guidance, and lead to usable knowledge. You receive evidence and acceptance checks, not just another file.
What access do you need?
A read-only repository snapshot or agreed export, relevant agent configuration, and examples of recurring friction. We agree permitted tools and model providers, redactions, retention, and deletion before handling private code. This website accepts no repository uploads.
Will this make our agents faster or cheaper?
The audit can identify context problems and recommend corrections. It does not promise productivity gains, lower token costs, or better task completion. Those outcomes need controlled, repeated trials in your actual environment.
What does the refund guarantee cover?
Missing or materially incomplete agreed deliverables. Tell us within 7 calendar days after delivery; we have 5 business days to supply or correct them, otherwise we refund your $2,500 audit fee. It is not an unconditional satisfaction or performance guarantee. Read the full terms.
Do you implement the fixes?
The audit includes findings, recommendations, acceptance checks, and a review. Your team can implement the plan. Implementation support or controlled agent trials would be scoped separately.
Do we need a new platform or subscription?
No. Recommendations fit your repository and tools. Adopting Open Knowledge Format is optional. This is a standalone audit, not a software subscription.
Is the sample a customer case study?
No. It is a real first-party inspection of our own small repository at commit 3b2678d. It demonstrates the report's evidence standard, not customer results or large-repository delivery performance. Customer case studies would require separate permission.
LESS REPEATING. A BETTER BRIEF.
Give your agents
more to go on.
Start with one repository